Rasmussen College Statistics and Quality Methods Paper

Rasmussen College Statistics and Quality Methods Paper

DO NOT WORK THIS ASSIGNMENT UNTIL DELIVERABLE 4 IS COMPLETED AS THEY BUILD ON EACH OTHER
Competency
Apply statistics to different quality methods in healthcare.
Course Scenario
Chaparral Regional Hospital is a small, urban hospital of approximately 60 beds, and offers the following:

Emergency room services
Intensive care
Surgical care
Obstetrics
Diagnostic services
Some rehabilitation therapies
Inpatient pharmacy services
Geriatric services and
Consumer physician referral services

Recently, the CEO has been hearing complaints from both patients and staff. You have been hired to design and implement a Quality Improvement Plan to help uncover quality problems and satisfactorily resolve them.
Scenario Continued
Your CEO has requested that you provide employee training on Quality Improvement. You have done an initial survey of patient satisfaction, and the CEO has asked you to explain how the data will be analyzed, using this initial data.
Given the variety of complaints coming from both employees and patients, it is critical for everyone to understand the importance of conducting the survey and obtaining solid data.
QuestionGreat5Good4OK3Fair2Poor1No ResponseTotalFacility and Convenience       Hours of Operations10173010040Convenience of location1015533440Cleanliness1114843040Waiting time in reception area9160411040Comfort while waiting2010550040Staff       Explained procedure179806040Questions answered1115723240Friendly and helpful215572040Knowledgeable and professional621433040Modesty respected1214806040Confidentiality respected (HIPAA)10101451040Overall Satisfaction       Overall impression of visit300532040Willingness to return310900040Likelihood of referring to others320431040
Respondents were also asked about their wait times. Here is the data on wait times:
Number respondingWait time before being checked in at Reception410 minutes1615 minutes820 minutes1225 minutesNumber respondingWait time before being seen by a healthcare professional210 minutes615 minutes1020 minutes2225 minutes
Instructions
You are to create an agenda for the training and a memo with bullet points to present the statistical analysis of the initial data. The memo should include an explanation of each of the statistical results. In particular, you should be able to explain what the results mean to the facility.
Determine the percentages of the following:

Percent who responded with a 5 (Great) on “Overall impression of the visit”
Percent who responded with a 2 (Fair) or 1 (Poor) on “Overall impression of the visit”
Percent who responded with a 5 (Great) on “Willingness to return”
Percent who responded with less than 5 on “Willingness to return”
In the area of “Facility and Convenience,” which indicator had the highest percentage of 5 (Great) responses? Which had the lowest?
In the area of “Staff,” which indicator had the highest percentage of 5 (Great) responses? Which had the lowest?

What is the mean waiting time in the reception area?
What is the mean waiting time to see a healthcare professional?
Microsoft Word has many memo templates. In your memo, be sure to address each statistical analysis and what it means to the facility. Why ask these questions? How could the data be used for quality improvement?
NOTE – APA formatting, and proper grammar, punctuation, and form required.
An agenda can set the tone for a meeting. It is an important tool to ensure meetings are staying on track and meeting all of the objectives. Create a detailed meeting agenda for a meeting you will hold with your supervisor and fellow department heads discussing your findings (Hint: Microsoft Word has many agenda templates).
Make sure to include the following in the agenda:

Explain each statistical example
How that data would be used
The majority of the agenda should be focused on data analysis and its use in QI plans

YOU MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA
Executes an appropriate format for a memo containing bullet points for training and a supporting structure.
Executes an agenda that includes supporting topics and related questions.
Correctly identifies how validity is related to measuring quality and thoroughly discusses supporting details.
Correctly identifies how reliability is related to measuring quality and thoroughly discusses supporting details.
Executes supporting questions that would be asked on a QI survey.