There is blame to be shared equally for both the physician and the patient in this scenario. The physician should have recognized that the elderly couple would not have the technical know-how to access the health portal and followed through with a call to ensure that the patient could access her health portal, thereby guaranteeing meaningful use of the electronic records. On the other hand, the patient is responsible for their own health, and assuming that the physician will call you when they clearly stated that they would not even if they needed to come back in for a reevaluation. The online health portal makes the patient more active with their own health. According to Greene and Hibbard (2012), the more active a patient is in regards to their own health, the better their health outcomes are likely to be. This activity includes patients seeking information on their own health, like accessing their health records online. Electronic health records that are accessible by the patient are a large step forward in making people accountable for their own health, so it should be continued. However, there are barriers to successful implementation. According to Chu, Huber, Mastel-Smith, and Cesario (2009), elderly adults and lower socioeconomic communities have unequal access to and training with technology. This difference can often produce anxiety, especially when the patient’s health is at stake. Chu et al. conducted a five week educational intervention to train communities on using technology and they found that their intervention lowered anxiety, raised computer confidence, and raised efficacy in using computers. While a program like this may not be available to most communities that health care providers serve, it is a start in developing a way to reach out to those who would otherwise be stranded in the Information Age.
Read the posts of the learner above and respond with engaging and detailed response. Weigh the suggestions of which the learner provided. From your point of view, how well might they work? Provide your reasons. This answer has to have a minimum of 150 words with one peer-reviewed & scholarly reference and citation.
Analyzes course concepts, theories, or materials correctly, using examples or supporting evidence.
Collaborates with fellow learners, relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the dialogue.
Applies relevant professional, personal, or other real-world experiences to extend the dialogue.
Validates position with applicable knowledge.