For this assignment, you will be plotting yourself on Rogerâ??s adoption curve, then youwill identif

For this assignment, you will be plotting yourself on Rogerâ??s adoption curve, then youwill identif

For this assignment, you will be plotting yourself on Roger’s adoption curve, then youwill identify one other person in your life (personal or professional) for EACH adoptioncategory. Answer the following questions in a 3-4 page paper:How do your differences in adoption category affect your communication witheach individual?How does each individual—including you—operate in and respond to our techcentric world?Why did you place each individual—including you—in each respective category?If you could, what would you change your category to? Provide reasons and anexplanation for your thought process.Please submit your paper by the posted due date.Rubric DetailA rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Yourinstructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select GridView or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: Reflection PaperDescription: Please adjust as needed for assignments. (percent range)ExitGrid ViewList ViewAdvancedProficientDevelopingIntroduction,Organization, andConclusionPoints Range:18 (18%) 20 (20%)Introduction engagesreader and focuses his orher attention on what is tofollow. Clear connection tothe prompt. Organization ofpaper supports flow ofideas and utilizes strongtransitions. Conclusionexamines implications ofthe thesis and gives thereader a substantialclosure/summary.Points Range:15 (15%) 17.8 (17.8%)Introduction highlights thegeneral subject of thepaper. Organization ofpaper supports flow ofideas and utilizestransitions. Conclusionsummarizes the thesis andwraps up ideas.Points Range:12 (12%) 14.8 (14.8%)Introduction does not focusthe intention of the paper.No clear connection toprompt. Organization ofpaper disrupts the flow ofideas and utilizes fewtransitions. Conclusion isvague and insufficient insummarizing the paper.Development,Evidence, and CriticalPoints Range:18 (18%) 20 (20%)Points Range:15 (15%) 17.8 (17.8%)Points Range:12 (12%) 14.8 (14.8%)AdvancedProficientDevelopingThinkingThe thesis, main points,and/or claims are supportedwith relevant and fullydeveloped (reader gainsinsight) personal examples,textual sources andscholarly academicsources. Supportingevidence is accuratelycited. Synthesis of thesources shows originalthought. Additionalacademic sources usedbeyond the requirement.Alternativeperspectives/positions areidentified. Student providesoriginal perspective,drawing on course contentand relevant academicresearch.Student’sarguments/perspectives aredeveloped on coursecontent and applicableacademic research.Connections betweenargument and research areclear. Student uses requiredacademic resources.Student develops astance/argument based onthemes and/or connectionsbetween course materialsand research.Student attempts to matchcourse materials toassumptions but does nothave correspondingresearch for support.Connections betweenargument and research areunclear. Student usesacademic support, butfewer resources thanrequired OR support usedis not academic in nature.Student’sargument/perspective isunclear or not cohesive withcourse materials.Critical SelfReflectionPoints Range:18 (18%) 20 (20%)Student analyzes personalassumptions andperspectives, integratescourse content, and offers anew approach/newperspective/newapplication.Points Range:15 (15%) 17.8 (17.8%)Student analyzes personalassumptions andperspectives, whileintegrating course content.Points Range:12 (12%) 14.8 (14.8%)Student describes lifeexperience(s) in light ofcourse content.Integration of BiblicalWorldviewPoints Range:18 (18%) 20 (20%)Student analyzes coursecontent against a biblicalworldview. Scripture isintegrated appropriately andthe effects and influencesare examined.Points Range:15 (15%) 17.8 (17.8%)Student analyzes contentagainst a biblical worldview.Scripture is integratedappropriately.Points Range:12 (12%) 14.8 (14.8%)Student provides vaguedescription of content inlight of relevant biblicalthemes. An attempt tointegrate Scripture is made.Language,Convention, andMechanicsPoints Range:18 (18%) 20 (20%)Strong, effective academicword choice; variety insentence structure; activevoice is primarily used.Paper contains few formator style errors (less than 2unique errors per page).Paper is clear and easy toread.Points Range:15 (15%) 17.8 (17.8%)Both conversational andacademic language used;some variety in sentencestructure; active andpassive voices are used.Paper contains minor errors(2 unique errors per page).Paper is clear and fairlyeasy to read.Points Range:12 (12%) 14.8 (14.8%)Conversational wordchoice; limited variety insentence structure; passivevoice is primarily used.Paper contains 3 or fewerunique errors per page.Paper is disorganized anddifficult to read.Name:Reflection PaperDescription:Please adjust as needed for assignments. (percent range)