No outside resources needed, only use the attached file, must use rao nouvell’s reading, and choose one from hammond or faust reading.
total word count: 1300
One paper, 4 pages minimum, which compares two cases of social movements, technology/science/innovation, institutions, markets, economies (or ideas about them), described in the assigned readings is due by the date indicated (no films or video clips may be used). You may compare virtually any two objects from two separate assigned reading provided the comparison is logical and is discussed in a manner that is cogent and logical. For example, you could compare how the markets in Nouvelle Cuisine and cotton production developed and operate. As a second example, you could compare how the readings discuss the role of institutions in the readings on Nouvelle Cuisine and those by Alexander Hamilton/James Madison (the former discusses the role of culinary schools and media and the latter discusses the role of the state/government). You may use these examples, respond to the prompts below or create your own prompt that compares two objects from the assigned readings.
Please hand in the papers to one of the two GEs in class on the date it is due AND upload them on Canvas to be analyzed by Vericite. Note, all page limits exclude your name and titles etc. Please use Times Roman font, point 12, double-space your essays, one-inch margins on all sides. All work must be your own.
- Compare and/or contrast the role of identity, or self-interested groups, in the creation of markets.
- Compare and/or contrast the role of law, institutions and/or the state in the creation of markets.
- Compare or contrast the role of science/technology in the economy (note manufacturing can be thought of as a technology also).
- Drawing on two cases read in the class, compare and/or contrast how the desire to initiate societal level changes creates opportunities for entrepreneurship, enterprise or market creation.
A Comprehensive referencing of the reading. The writer is able to convey their arguments using a mastery of the reading. No editing, proofing or grammatical errors.
A- Comprehensive referencing of the reading. The writer is able to convey their arguments using a mastery of the reading. 2 or less editing, proofing or grammatical errors.
B+ Demonstrates a general understanding of the reading. Some filling in of history. 3 or more grammatical, proofing, errors.
B Demonstrates a general understanding of the reading with errors. May also fill in history. Several grammar errors
B- Understanding has some errors but shows some understanding that don’t detract from main argument seriously. Several grammar errors.
C Several errors with little understanding of main ideas.
C- No understanding of the reading. Several grammar errors.
D Paper shows little coherence.