     Points:Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NAFeedback:           Points:Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NAFeedback:           Points:Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:Show DescriptionsShow FeedbackMain Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance44 (44%) – 44 (44%)Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.supported by at least 3 current
credible sourcesExcellent Performance40 (40%) – 43 (43%)Responds to the discussion question(s)is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.75% of post has exceptional depth and breadthsupported by at least 3 credible referencesCompetent Performance35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to most of the discussion question(s)is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.50% of post has exceptional depth and breadthsupported by at least 3 credible referencesProficient Performance31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s)one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressedis somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesissomewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.post is cited with fewer than 2 credible referencesRoom for Improvement0 (0%) – 30 (30%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s)lacks depth or superficially addresses criterialacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesisdoes not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.contains only 1 or no credible referencesFeedback:Main Posting:Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Written clearly and conciselyContains no grammatical or spelling errorsFully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and styleExcellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Written clearly and conciselyMay contain one or no grammatical or spelling errorAdheres to current APA manual writing rules and styleCompetent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Written conciselyMay contain one to two grammatical or spelling errorAdheres to current APA manual writing rules and styleProficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Written somewhat conciselyMay contain more than two spelling or grammatical errorsContains some APA formatting errorsRoom for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Not written clearly or conciselyContains more than two spelling or grammatical errorsDoes not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleFeedback:Main Posting:Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Meets requirements for timely and full participationposts main discussion by due dateExcellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NACompetent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NAProficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NARoom for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settingsresponds to questions posed by facultythe use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectivesExcellent Performance8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settingsCompetent Performance7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice settingProficient Performance6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic
